The same evidence release feeds this site and UK Facts dev. A website update is not a new review of every source.
Local interpretation reviewed 2026-10-17. Ward boundaries: May 2026; individual source retrieval dates and periods are below. Snapshot 5032dea62a24.
Download the full shared package · All ward data and boundaries
This includes all shared local measures, projects, linked issues and actions, ward figures, historical housing and community survey evidence.
Browse the full evidence library →
Earlier published records are retained with their original dates. They are an archive of the evidence used, not newly rechecked statistics.
2026 ONS official electoral ward membership and May 2026 generalised clipped boundaries. These are not police neighbourhoods or parishes.
Original Census 2021 observations. Chichester and Portsmouth use published ward values; Southampton uses sums of complete Census output-area counts through the official 2026 ONS best-fit lookup. Output areas can straddle ward boundaries; best-fit allocation is an approximation. Census privacy protection can cause small differences between totals and summed categories.
The same Census definitions, reference day and denominator rules are used. Small differences between direct ward publication and OA aggregation are possible; neither is a current population estimate.
Agent source/category/geography and calculation checks; independent analytical review remains outstanding.
not provided; electoral wards are not parishes
Office for National Statistics · checked 2026-10-17T09:57:14.669455+00:00
Official source ↗2 stored request receipts. Exact URLs, retrieval dates and checksums are in the download.
Office for National Statistics via Nomis · checked 2026-10-17T09:57:14.669455+00:00
Official source ↗6 stored request receipts. Exact URLs, retrieval dates and checksums are in the download.
Office for National Statistics via Nomis · checked 2026-10-17T09:57:14.669455+00:00
Official source ↗6 stored request receipts. Exact URLs, retrieval dates and checksums are in the download.
Office for National Statistics via Nomis · checked 2026-10-17T09:57:14.669455+00:00
Official source ↗6 stored request receipts. Exact URLs, retrieval dates and checksums are in the download.
Office for National Statistics via Nomis · checked 2026-10-17T09:57:14.669455+00:00
Official source ↗6 stored request receipts. Exact URLs, retrieval dates and checksums are in the download.
Office for National Statistics via Nomis · checked 2026-10-17T09:57:14.669455+00:00
Official source ↗6 stored request receipts. Exact URLs, retrieval dates and checksums are in the download.
Office for National Statistics via Nomis · checked 2026-10-17T09:57:14.669455+00:00
Official source ↗6 stored request receipts. Exact URLs, retrieval dates and checksums are in the download.
Office for National Statistics · checked 2026-10-17T09:57:14.669455+00:00
Official source ↗1 stored request receipts. Exact URLs, retrieval dates and checksums are in the download.
Police.uk / Home Office and territorial police forces · checked 2026-10-17T09:57:14.669455+00:00
Official source ↗Single padded rectangle per authority-month, deduplicate nonblank numeric IDs within each response; retain idless rows; point-in-polygon into fixed May 2026 official ward geometry; no nearest-boundary reassignment. ASB and BTP are excluded from crime totals. The same ward boundaries apply to all displayed months. Reporting completeness is not guaranteed by API availability.
72 stored request receipts. Exact URLs, retrieval dates and checksums are in the download.
Imported from the published Southampton Counts evidence register; the original review date is retained. Evidence file/hash/table details remain in the full baseline download.
Imported from the published Southampton Counts evidence register; the original review date is retained. Evidence file/hash/table details remain in the full baseline download.
Imported from the published Southampton Counts evidence register; the original review date is retained. Evidence file/hash/table details remain in the full baseline download.
Imported from the published Southampton Counts evidence register; the original review date is retained. Evidence file/hash/table details remain in the full baseline download.
Imported from the published Southampton Counts evidence register; the original review date is retained. Evidence file/hash/table details remain in the full baseline download.
Imported from the published Southampton Counts evidence register; the original review date is retained. Evidence file/hash/table details remain in the full baseline download.
Imported from the published Southampton Counts evidence register; the original review date is retained. Evidence file/hash/table details remain in the full baseline download.
Imported from the published Southampton Counts evidence register; the original review date is retained. Evidence file/hash/table details remain in the full baseline download.
Imported from the published Southampton Counts evidence register; the original review date is retained. Evidence file/hash/table details remain in the full baseline download.
Imported from the published Southampton Counts evidence register; the original review date is retained. Evidence file/hash/table details remain in the full baseline download.
Imported from the published Southampton Counts evidence register; the original review date is retained. Evidence file/hash/table details remain in the full baseline download.
Imported from the published Southampton Counts evidence register; the original review date is retained. Evidence file/hash/table details remain in the full baseline download.
Imported from the published Southampton Counts evidence register; the original review date is retained. Evidence file/hash/table details remain in the full baseline download.
Proposed traffic-order consultation evidence; it confirms development was underway, not completion or that the road order was subsequently made.
Official council publication read through indexed publisher text; direct council HTML retrieval returned 403. Publication dates and current delivery status are not interchangeable.
Growth and Prosperity delivery programme, page 96: £36m Outdoor Sports Centre regeneration, aiming for early 2027. This is a planned outcome, not proof of completion.
Live council transport page read directly on 17 October. Start on 19 October 2026 remains a future scheduled event at this review.
Official council publication read through indexed publisher text; direct council HTML retrieval returned 403. Publication dates and current delivery status are not interchangeable. The council says funding approval is still required.
Report version dated in filename; paragraph 53 identifies delivery partners and paragraph 54 describes planned applications, not completed homes.
Page 54 states River Itchen flood-scheme delivery timescales remain subject to funding. This supersedes treating the older provisional 2026 start as an actual start.
Official council publication read through indexed publisher text; direct council HTML retrieval returned 403. Publication dates and current delivery status are not interchangeable. January 2024 ground investigations are historical evidence, not proof that construction has begun.
Official council publication read through indexed publisher text; direct council HTML retrieval returned 403. Publication dates and current delivery status are not interchangeable.
Official council publication read through indexed publisher text; direct council HTML retrieval returned 403. Publication dates and current delivery status are not interchangeable. A partnership vision is not a fully funded construction programme.
Report describes Great Oaks/Vermont proposals and a proposed implementation date of 20 April 2026. This report alone does not confirm opening or delivery.
Programme describes two special-education facilities for 180 children, with 2026 intended delivery. Current completion remains unverified.
The council publishes scheme and service updates, including August 2026 information. Timetables may change; use the current operator timetable for travel.
The official decision page links the implementation programme. Inclusion in a plan does not mean each scheme is funded or built.
Requires improvement. A regulator assessment of adult social care, not a rating of every council service.
City partnership assessment and strategy evidence; city totals and street-mapped police data are different measures.
Use the published Local Development Scheme for the current timetable; an emerging plan is not an adopted plan.
Editorial continuity reference. Local actions below develop existing housing, inequality, transport, regeneration, care and flood themes; this is not an external source for statistics.
Practical reporting route; recorded incidents depend on reporting and council recording practices.
Original provider-level Office for Students observations retained from the published Counts explorer. These are not counts of students living in the city.
Our approach follows the AQuA Book: keep a clear question, record sources and assumptions, test calculations and show uncertainty. Automated checks are not independent analytical review or certification.
Council documents are checked for changes; a changed page goes into a review queue. It does not automatically become a new claim or a completed project. Source failures retain the last successful evidence and are recorded.